On March 21, 2013, the United States Senate approved an amendment by a vote of 79 to 20 to repeal the 2.3 percent medical device excise tax.
On March 21, 2013, the United States Senate approved an amendment by a vote of 79 to 20 to repeal the 2.3 percent medical device excise tax. The tax, which went into effect this past January, was included as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Despite the vote, it is far from clear that repeal of the tax will occur. The repeal is largely symbolic because the resolution was an amendment to the Senate Democrats’ budget, a partisan measure that is not likely to pass the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Further, although this type of amendment binds Congress to certain budgetary priorities, it does not have the force of law. The resolution is not likely to be brought to the Senate as a stand-alone bill, but it may be considered in general discussions to revamp the tax code and cut the deficit.
William Kitchens
Another substantial obstacle the repeal faces is included in the resolution itself: the repeal cannot “increase the deficit over either the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2018 or the period of the total of fiscal years 2013 through 2023.” Despite this condition, the resolution does not include an offset to the cost, and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that repealing the tax would cost $29 billion over a 10-year period. Thus, even if the repeal were to eventually pass, Congress would need to find a way to compensate for the repeal.
Although Congress has introduced legislation that would offset the tax, these efforts have not yet been met with broader Congressional support. Sources remain doubtful about Congress agreeing on an alternative source of revenue. Nonetheless, the resolution is evidence that a growing number of Senators have begun to support the repeal. The resolution was adopted by a significant majority in the Senate, which demonstrates that future legislation to repeal the medical device tax could attract similarly strong bipartisan support. The bipartisan amendment was introduced by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN).
William Kitchens is partner, food and drug practice, at Arnall Golden Gregory LLP. He can be reached at william.kitchens@agg.com.
Johnson & Johnson Seeks FDA Approval for Subcutaneous Tremfya Regimen for Ulcerative Colitis
November 22nd 2024Johnson & Johnson has submitted a supplemental Biologics License Application to the FDA for a subcutaneous induction regimen of Tremfya for adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis based on positive Phase III ASTRO trial results.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.
Fake Weight Loss Drugs: Growing Threat to Consumer Health
October 25th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, UpScriptHealth's Peter Ax, Founder and CEO, and George Jones, Chief Operations Officer, discuss the issue of counterfeit weight loss drugs, the potential health risks associated with them, increasing access to legitimate weight loss medications and more.