FDA, industry relationship improves since 1997
The Food and Drug Administration has significantly improved its relationship with the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, but a recent survey shows that the agency still needs to work to eliminate unnecessary delays in approving new products and devices.
The Food and Drug Administration has significantly improved its relationship with the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, but a recent survey shows that the agency still needs to work to eliminate unnecessary delays in approving new products and devices.
The survey, jointly conducted by the University of California at San Diego's Technology and Entrepreneurship Program, and New York-based PricewaterhouseCoopers, found that delays in approvals are frequently related to inadequate technical expertise of FDA reviewers. Survey respondents also noted that there is high turnover among the agency's reviewers, which also contributes to delays.
Don Grimm, director of the "Improving America's Health" survey, said: "The study shows that there is still work to do to reduce unnecessary approval delays so that patients can benefit from worthy medicines and devices."
"Improving America's Health" is a bi-annual survey that was first conducted in 1995 to identify and track delays in the FDA approval process. Respondents were U.S. companies that had a drug device or biologic in clinical trials under agency supervision between January 1, 1998 and June 30, 1999. This year's survey is the first to be conducted since the enactment of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997.
Strengthened communications
The survey cites improvement in the overall communication between the FDA and the sponsoring companies, particularly in the areas of response time for inquiries and ease of contact. Overall, 48% of the respondents categorized their communications with the agency as "excellent," in comparison to 41% in 1997 and 34% in 1995. Additionally, 64% responded that it was easy or very easy to contact the reviewers â an increase from 52% in 1995.
More room for improvement
In addition to the turnover of agency personnel, respondents indicated that there are several other factors that continue to delay the approval process unnecessarily, including unclear data requests from the FDA. An increasing number of companies surveyed (42% in 1999 versus 27% in 1997) indicated that the turnover of key reviewers impeded the approval process. Twenty-seven percent of sponsors indicated that the lack of technical expertise on the part of a reviewer unduly delayed the approval process, up from 21% in 1997 and 18% in 1995. PR
Addressing Disparities in Psoriasis Trials: Takeda's Strategies for Inclusivity in Clinical Research
April 14th 2025LaShell Robinson, Head of Global Feasibility and Trial Equity at Takeda, speaks about the company's strategies to engage patients in underrepresented populations in its phase III psoriasis trials.
Beyond the Prescription: Pharma's Role in Digital Health Conversations
April 1st 2025Join us for an insightful conversation with Jennifer Harakal, Head of Regulatory Affairs at Canopy Life Sciences, as we unpack the evolving intersection of social media and healthcare decisions. Discover how pharmaceutical companies can navigate regulatory challenges while meaningfully engaging with consumers in digital spaces. Jennifer shares expert strategies for responsible marketing, working with influencers, and creating educational content that bridges the gap between patients and healthcare providers. A must-listen for pharma marketers looking to build trust and compliance in today's social media landscape.
