Prescription drug user fee revenues will be $59 million lower than originally expected over the five years of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act II, the Food and Drug Administration announced.
Prescription drug user fee revenues will be $59 million lower than originally expected over the five years of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act II, the Food and Drug Administration announced.
User fees - fees paid to the FDA by new drug application sponsors in order to fund staffing and resources in the new drug approval process - have been a key factor in accelerating the approval of new drugs since the Prescription Drug User Fee Act was first passed in 1994.
"Assumptions have been significantly revised, based on a more conservative projection of PDUFA fee revenue," said the FDA in its fiscal year 1999 revision of the PDUFA II five-year plan, which runs from 1998 to 2002. "The estimate of revenue expected over the five years is reduced from $740 million to $681 million."
The FDA blames the reduction on the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, which expanded the number of application submissions that were exempt from user fees. "In fiscal year 1998, the number of applications submitted to FDA for review declined for the first time in six years," according to the FDA. "FDAMA amendments exacerbated this decline, causing over 30 more applications to be exempt from fees than would have been exempt previously. Thus, there was a substantial decline in the number of fee-paying applications in fiscal year 1998."
According to FDAMA, orphan drug applications, small business applications and supplemental applications for pediatric indications can be exempt from user fees.
Despite this reduction in fee-paying applications, total workload under PDUFA, which includes items exempt from fees as well as an increasing volume of work not subject to fees â including investigational new drug submissions and manufacturing supplements â increased in fiscal year 1998, according to the FDA.
The reduction in user fees will affect the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research in two ways:
•Â There will be an increase of only 101 full time equivalent employees by the end of the plan's five years (down from 240 in the original plan). Costs for additional staff and operating support to enhance the review process over the five years of the plan has been reduced from $103 million to $80 million.
•Â Information technologies over the five years of the plan have been reduced from $61 million to $54 million.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America does not anticipate that these reductions will affect the acceleration of the FDA's review process. "There is still going to be enough money raised to keep the improvement goals going," said Jeff Trewhitt, spokesperson for PhRMA. "Yes, there is going to be a drop in user fee money, but there will be enough public money from Congress to proceed." PR
Fake Weight Loss Drugs: Growing Threat to Consumer Health
October 25th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, UpScriptHealth's Peter Ax, Founder and CEO, and George Jones, Chief Operations Officer, discuss the issue of counterfeit weight loss drugs, the potential health risks associated with them, increasing access to legitimate weight loss medications and more.
The Transformative Role of Medical Information in Customer Engagement
October 3rd 2024Stacey Fung, Head of Global Medical Information at Gilead Lifesciences, delves into the evolving role of Medical Information (MI) in the pharmaceutical industry. Covering key topics like patient engagement through omnichannel strategies, combating misinformation, and leveraging AI to enhance medical inquiries, the conversation with Stacey highlights MI's critical role in ensuring patient safety and supporting drug development. She also shares her professional journey and tidbits for early career professionals on professional development.
To Tackle the Plastic Waste Crisis in Pharma, Here’s Where to Start
October 30th 2024By demonstrating big advancements in recycling, pharma companies will be much more likely to attract shareholders and other investors, giving themselves a leg up in the competition to lead the biopharmaceutical industry well into the future.