With conflicting lower court decisions over whether pharmaceutical sales reps should be paid for overtime, the Supreme Court has agreed to settle the matter. The court will hear the case brought by two former GSK reps that were denied their overtime claim by a Circuit Court.
With conflicting lower court decisions over whether pharmaceutical sales reps should be paid for overtime, the Supreme Court has agreed to settle the matter. The court will hear the case brought by two former GSK reps that were denied their overtime claim by a Circuit Court.
For years the industry has warned that overtime suits may swamp the industry with potentially billions of retroactive payments.
The biggest challenge for the Court will be to untangle conflicting stances from the various circuit courts. Last year a lower court decisions granted overtime payments to sales representatives at Novartis and Merck, finding that sales reps at Novartis and Schering Plough (now Merck) did not qualify for the "sales" exemption and were in fact owed overtime pay.
In the suit reps claimed that their primary responsibility was to visit physicians' offices, drop off drug samples, and deliver scripted messages about the company's products. Echoing the opinion of much of the pharmaceutical industry, the company argued that these workers are outside salespersons and therefore exempt from overtime pay under federal and state law.
Interestingly, The Department of Justice has argued along with the reps, that the employees were not eligible for an "outside sales exemption" and, in fact, were not engaged in sales activities.
A decision is not expected until June 2012.
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.