Oncology-market access doesn’t “just happen” anymore. As competition in the U.S. health-care market only continues to intensify, oncology-drug companies will need a good corporate strategy to ensure physician uptake and payer coverage of therapies.
Oncology-market access doesn’t “just happen” anymore. As competition in the U.S. health-care market only continues to intensify, oncology-drug companies will need a good corporate strategy to ensure physician uptake and payer coverage of therapies. Having strong clinical data isn’t enough, especially as stakeholders grow ever more sophisticated, weigh more options-and have more leverage to demand data and deals for contracts, discounts and rebates.
Oncology-drug companies can’t wait until these new demands are right at their doorstep. They must start working today to ensure they have solid yet adaptable market access capabilities for tomorrow. Good market access can’t be achieved on the fly. It can’t be cookie-cutter or static.
Here are three core capabilities to begin building now.
1. The ability to engage with a range of stakeholders
At one time, oncology companies promoted their products mainly to oncologists. But now, oncologists are not the only (nor even always the primary) decision makers when it comes to treatment choices and the stakeholder ecosystem will continue to grow in complexity. So companies need to map out the stakeholders and develop a strategy to address all of these decisions makers effectively.
The stakeholder map will vary widely by geography: In Boston, for instance, hospital groups predominate; in Texas and Florida, broad oncology practices are more common.
Companies need a deep understanding of these stakeholders and a stakeholder-specific strategy for engaging each in the field. They also need the right personnel, in both number and skills. These personnel need to understand stakeholders’ motivations and engage with them-and sooner rather than later.
2. The ability to design contracting and discounting strategies
Although pharmaceutical giants may have extensive experience in contracting and discounting strategies for general medicine, they are often unlikely to know how to design and evaluate contracting and discounting strategies specific to oncology. And oncology-focused companies need to build new capabilities altogether. All companies need to understand the tradeoffs among oncology treatment options. For example, they need to understand where payer contracting is appropriate, how much to rebate payers and what terms to negotiate. Some of the contract structures that emerge may also differ from the predominant flat or share-based rebates that we have long observed in general medicines. Companies may need to explore innovative ideas like indication-specific contracts for oncology drugs that could be used for a variety of patient types, each with different competition.
Pharmaceutical companies also need to account for the fact that the data used for evaluating strategies is typically spottier in oncology than in other therapeutic areas, requiring them to use analytics and triangulation from multiple sources to arrive at the right levels of contracting and discounting.
3. The ability to operate contracting and discounting strategies
Once companies have a solid understanding of the stakeholder ecosystem and developed specific strategies, they need practical ways to make their contracting and discounting strategies work. Those with a legacy in general medicine have related experience in other therapeutic areas-but they need to adapt those abilities for the unique environment of oncology. And oncology-specific companies often need to build them from scratch.
At issue are tactical capabilities. Once contracts are signed, how will companies deliver on the terms? They will need to undertake several tasks-collecting data from payers, GPOs and other integrated providers; validating the information; paying rebates, and others-all at once, and carry them out seamlessly.
These three capabilities aren’t the only ones needed for successful market access, of course, but they do represent some of the fundamental, ongoing changes oncology-drug companies are facing.
What other capabilities are key to maintaining and strengthening market access-now and in the future?
Addressing Disparities in Psoriasis Trials: Takeda's Strategies for Inclusivity in Clinical Research
April 14th 2025LaShell Robinson, Head of Global Feasibility and Trial Equity at Takeda, speaks about the company's strategies to engage patients in underrepresented populations in its phase III psoriasis trials.
Beyond the Prescription: Pharma's Role in Digital Health Conversations
April 1st 2025Join us for an insightful conversation with Jennifer Harakal, Head of Regulatory Affairs at Canopy Life Sciences, as we unpack the evolving intersection of social media and healthcare decisions. Discover how pharmaceutical companies can navigate regulatory challenges while meaningfully engaging with consumers in digital spaces. Jennifer shares expert strategies for responsible marketing, working with influencers, and creating educational content that bridges the gap between patients and healthcare providers. A must-listen for pharma marketers looking to build trust and compliance in today's social media landscape.
Pfizer, GSK Gain ACIP Recommendations for RSV and Meningococcal Vaccines
April 18th 2025The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted to expand access to Pfizer’s respiratory syncytial virus vaccine Abrysvo for high-risk adults in their 50s and voted in favor of GSK’s meningococcal vaccine, Penmenvy, for streamlined adolescent protection.