This month is as good a time as any to take a deep look at the transformations taking place in point-of-care delivery.
Now well into our fifth year since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which coincided with approaches that were already emerging in healthcare delivery (i.e., telehealth), it’s as good a time as any to take a comprehensive look at how the point-of-care terrain has indeed changed. We do just that in our September issue of Pharm Exec.
Capturing some valuable perspective, we present a deep dive into point-of-care (or site-of-care) trends in a feature by guest authors Luke Forsthoefel, Yakir Siegal, and Gregory Lief of Asymmetry Group, a life sciences consulting firm. The group finds that the diversification in recent years of point-of-care delivery models is accelerating rapidly. While new and alternative entrants have disrupted the scene from the retail and tech worlds—think CVS, Walgreens, Amazon, and the like—so, too, has the influx of “non-traditional” entrants and those companies specializing in digitally integrated care delivery.
“Generational differences in patient behaviors, a growing urgency to address healthcare inequities, and the expanding burden of long-term chronic disease management among older patients are creating pressures for diversification of where and how care is delivered,” the authors write.
The piece delves into those factors driving this change and also, importantly, the implications for biopharma leaders in their “go-to-market” strategies—providing a framework for altering market-entry models accordingly. For example, the authors note the impact of consolidation among larger health systems, including those physician practices within, in attempts to build competitive advantage. This horizontal consolidation, coupled with the expansion of corporate-owned care delivery entities, have sparked greater centralization of decision-making in care delivery, the piece also explains.
“As a result, the traditional go-to-market focus on the prescriber may no longer be sufficient to drive desired behaviors,” the authors contend. “Instead, it is important now more than ever to take a B2B approach to engaging with care delivery organizations holistically as key customer accounts.”
To that end, the piece proposes three core B2B engagement principles for biopharma: 1) be a partner, not a supplier; 2) think holistically about customer value; and 3) offer solutions, not products. I encourage you to check out the feature for insights on how to put these principles into practice and for more useful information and data on navigating this new era in point-of-care delivery.
As always, thanks for reading.
Mike Hennessy Jr. is President and CEO of MJH Life Sciences
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.