While KOLs have been present in healthcare marketing for some time, DOLs are now emerging.
Each issue of Pharmaceutical Executive holds fast to a theme of importance to the pharma industry—one that the sector needs to be aware of now. Naturally, our team works hard to keep our fingers on the pulse of the latest occurrences and most relevant topics. But I can’t help but find it fascinating when the tide of change influences the direction of topics discussed within an issue.
This particular issue of Pharm Exec hones in on key opinion leaders (KOLs) and digital opinion leaders (DOLs), specifically in two feature articles and in our Back Page column.
KOLs are nothing new to healthcare marketing—they are resources pharma has turned to for years. But DOLs have emerged in recent years as online platforms have become more relevant. In the first article, Mike Hollan, editor, explains that because KOLs were inaccessible during the pandemic, DOLs became the “go-to.” Personally, I see DOLs as the “pharma influencer” in the digital age, similar to how there are influencers in every topic/niche (and, essentially, in every industry) across social media.
How to talk to each group of opinion leaders differs. The information they need and the method of communication vary. For example, DOLs may be more technologically savvy than KOLs, and they may not be HCPs. In addition, sometimes KOLs (physicians) are also DOLs in that they have a social media presence online. But many KOLs do not have such presence. Definitely check out Hollan’s article for a deep dive into what KOLs and DOLs are, how they differ, and ways to communicate with each.
In our Back Page piece, Read Roberts, director of KOL data solutions for PRECISIONscientia, explains that the industry is struggling to sort out whether they should target KOLs or DOLs. As is the case with any company, there are only so many resources as well as time in the day. It simply isn’t feasible for a pharma company to touch base with every single KOL and DOL within a therapeutic area. As such, who should be prioritized and why? Roberts digs into this question in the column. One advantage of DOLs is the sheer quantity of people within their social network.
Deepak Patil, senior director of medical strategy for Aktana, explores in his contributed feature that accompanies Holland’s piece about what is means to be “KOL-centric” and how KOLs are being “slammed” with information from all sides. To connect with these opinion leaders, Patil reveals what pharma needs to know and how to disseminate it in such a way that it’s easily and quickly digestible. Gone are the days when the same messaging works for everyone. Personalize, personalize, personalize. Equally important, keep track of who has been contacted by your company so that KOLs aren’t contacted more than once.
One can only hope that the presence of KOLs and DOLs can help to limit the spread of misinformation while also empowering patients to take their health and treatments into their own hands.
Of course, there are many other great topics covered in this issue that we hope you find useful. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to the team with requested topics you’d like to see in the future. We can be reached at pharmexec@mjhlifesciences.com.
Meg Rivers is Pharm Exec’s managing editor and can be reached at mrivers@mjhlifesciences.com.
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.