Consultancy firm IDEA Pharma has released what it calls a ‘Productive Innovation Index’, which ranks pharmaceutical companies based on their ability to successfully commercialize new innovations.
By Stephanie Sutton, PharmTech Europe.
Consultancy firm IDEA Pharma has released what it calls a ‘Productive Innovation Index’, which ranks pharmaceutical companies based on their ability to successfully commercialize new innovations. The company has been published the index for three years and uses publicly available data to reach its conclusions.
Although the index may not be a complete picture of innovation in the industry, given that there are no doubt many other data not available to the public about the state of innovation within a company, the results are still an interesting read.
“We wanted to assess the pharmaceutical industry’s ability to add value to, and derive value from, molecules in pre-launch, so we analysed the major players based on a range of observations including speed to market, attrition rate in phase III, sales versus ostensibly similar molecules, and regulatory success,” IDEA Pharma’s CEO, Mike Rea, said in a statement.
Johnson & Johnson claimed the top spot as the pharmaceutical industry’s most innovative firm. According to IDEA Pharma, there were two main factors contributing to the company’s success. Rea said, “It successfully brought to market Abiraterone (Zytiga) - a lyase and steroid synthesis inhibitor for use in the treatment of prostate cancer - and furthermore it was a major riser in the Access to Medicine Index, which is of increasing global importance.”
The other nine companies occupying the top ten were Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Merck & Co., Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb and Abbott (ranked second to ninth respectively in the index). Do you agree with the results?
Rea added, “Innovation is not only about what you discover, it’s about what you put on the market, so a carefully-considered strategy is critical. Some companies are so eager to clear the regulatory hurdles that it creates a culture of panic leading to the wrong behaviour.”
One notable omission from the top ten is Pfizer, which was ranked eleventh. AstraZeneca also failed to make the top ten; coming in at fifteenth.
“AstraZeneca is the perfect example of a company which has shown all the signs of panic over the past five years,” said Rea. “The stress of an underwhelming pipeline has led it to make bad decisions on top of bad decisions, and although it enjoyed some top line growth by flogging its sales model, the same primary care sales model has led to poor decisions in many areas.”
You can read the full index, comprising 24 pharmaceutical companies, here.
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.