Pharmaceutical Executive
Washington, DC-More countries are hosting pharma's R&D efforts, creating a research environment ripe for abuses of patient safety because FDA cannot ensure the same protection in foreign trials as in domestic ones. A recent study by the US Health and Human Service's office of the inspector general (OIG) found that regions with less research experience-including Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia-have become more desirable locations for US-based companies and contract research organizations' clinical trials. In fact, the number of countries producing data for FDA submissions jumped from 28 to 79 between 1989 and 1999. And that trend shows no
Washington, DC-More countries are hosting pharma's R&D efforts, creating a research environment ripe for abuses of patient safety because FDA cannot ensure the same protection in foreign trials as in domestic ones. A recent study by the US Health and Human Service's office of the inspector general (OIG) found that regions with less research experience-including Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia-have become more desirable locations for US-based companies and contract research organizations' clinical trials. In fact, the number of countries producing data for FDA submissions jumped from 28 to 79 between 1989 and 1999. And that trend shows no signs of slowing.
Currently, foreign institutional review boards (IRBs) oversee the ethical treatment of patients, but they have been widely criticized by the pharma industry, national regulatory authorities, the National Bioethics Commission, and the World Health Organization for their lack of experience and insufficient monitoring practices.
IRBs are known as ethical committees-there to protect the populations' safety-says Basil Burke, PhD, vice-president of drug discovery and development for Clinimetrics, a global CRO. Whether they are doing that is a pivotal question that FDA must face. Right now, it is up to CEOs to recognize and stop shortcuts on patients' rights.
The issue has heated up since the Washington Post ran a series of articles in late 2000, questioning Pfizer's treatment of Nigerian children participating in its 1996 clinical trials for the meningitis treatment Trovan (trova-floxacin) and inspiring OIG to conduct the study.
Yet companies will probably continue to seek emerging regions for clinical trials because it makes business sense: Large numbers of eager participants and naïve subjects-patients untreated for the disease being studied-save companies money by speeding trial recruitment, and testing in another country allows extended market development. Enabling the trend is FDA's acceptance of international data in line with the standardized procedures laid down at the 1990 International Conference on Harmonization.
In the report cover letter, inspector general Janet Rehnquist issues her recommendations for FDA and the Office for Human Research Protections to help ensure foreign protections are at least equivalent to US regulations. They include:
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.