Some shareholders think they were shafted in the multi-billion dollar deal between Sepracor and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma. They're so miffed, in fact, that they've filed a lawsuit stating that the amount offered undervalues the company and its shares.
Sepracor shareholders are voicing their concern over the company’s proposed $2.6 billion sale to Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma in a lawsuit filed yesterday in Delaware.
Less than one week after announcing the deal between the Japanese firms, investors are calling the price negotiated-$23 per share in cash-inadequate and unfair. Sepracor, however, insists that the offer price represents a 48 percent premium over the stock’s six-month average price, and a 27.6 percent premium over the closing price of Sepracor’s common stock as of September 1.
Credit Suisse analyst Scott Hirsch stated in a letter to investors that while Sepracor’s sales are close to $400 million a year, its dwindling development pipeline (mostly respiratory and central nervous system treatments) doesn’t make the company appealing to a large number of buyers.
“In our view, if a US firm wanted Sepracor, that likely would’ve happened already, as there have been plenty of lookers over the years,’’ Hirsch stated. “We think Dainippon Sumitomo is more interested in the sales platform and operating leverage than the revenue stream.’’
The two investors filing the suit claim that Sepracor didn’t leave much room for negotiating after the bid was made. They noted the inclusion of a $77.4 million termination fee and a “no solicitation” provision giving Dainaippon first chance to counter other offers. The complaint also states that Sepracor “did not undertake to canvas the market prior to entering into the proposed merger, and thus failed to inform themselves of the inherent fair value of the company.”
Sepracor could not be reached for comment by deadline.
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.
What Every Pharma CEO Should Know About Unlocking the Potential of Scientific Data
December 11th 2024When integrated into pharmaceutical enterprises, scientific data has the potential to drive organizational growth and innovation. Mikael Hagstroem, CEO at leading laboratory informatics provider LabVantage Solutions, discusses how technology partners add significant value to pharmaceutical R&D, in addition to manufacturing quality.
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512